If you take nothing else away from the ruling in Perry v Schwarzenegger…

“A state’s interest in an enactment must of course be secular in nature. The state does not have an interest in enforcing private moral or religious beliefs without an accompanying secular purpose. See Lawrence v Texas, 539 US 558, 571 (2003); see also Everson v Board of Education of Ewing Township, 330 US 1, 15 (1947)…”

and

“In the absence of a rational basis, what remains of proponents’ case is an inference, amply supported by evidence in the record, that Proposition 8 was premised on the belief that same-sex couples simply are not as good as opposite-sex couples. FF 78-80. Whether that belief is based on moral disapproval of homosexuality, animus towards gays and lesbians or simply a belief that a relationship between a man and a woman is inherently better than a relationship between two men or two women, this belief is not a proper basis on which to legislate…”

One Reply to “If you take nothing else away from the ruling in Perry v Schwarzenegger…”

  1. “this belief is not a proper basis on which to legislate”
    There are so many quotable parts to the ruling, it’s hard to know where to start sometimes. This is the first time I’ve ever read any ruling anywhere anytime. It is so unambiguous that it just makes the wingnuts who cry out against look even more willfully ignorant and stupid than they already do.
    Right now I’m very happy. I know it’s not over yet, but I will enjoy this while I can.
    LOVE is the most important thing. Ever. Period.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.