Are my eyes really blue?

So Rand Paul, newly minted Republican candidate for Senate from Kentucky, is currently the object of a firestorm around his comments that he didn’t approve of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  His logic is lifted straight from the Goldwater-era opposition to the law, which is to say: racism is bad, but so is government telling people who they should or shouldn’t do business with.  Civil rights law to prohibit discrimination in institutions, good; law to prevent private discrimination, bad, which is “the hard part of believing in freedom.”

There’s ideological consistency there, and it’s not a position that’s in and of itself grounded in racism.  I don’t think you could say with a clear conscience that Rand Paul is a racist, because he’s not making an argument grounded in racism or white supremacy.  I’m trying to unwind the logic here, which seems to be: there shouldn’t be any laws permitting discrimination, but there shouldn’t be any laws prohibiting discrimination either.  Be that as it may.  It’s the standard true-believer libertarian line: if you have problems like this, the free market will resolve them, because it’s not in your economic interest to discriminate against customers or to do things that will alienate your customers; therefore any business person who wants to turn a profit will certainly serve one and all on equal footing.

Which, simply put, is horseshit.

There was every economic incentive to discriminate in the Jim Crow era, law aside.  Look at the logic:

1) Majority population hates minority population, or at the very least wants them segregated.

2) Business could make money serving minority population, but would alienate majority.

3) Business could make MORE money serving majority population and foregoing minority trade.

4) Business segregates, leaving minority-run business to handle minority trade.

5) PROFIT!!!

The Deep South had a hundred years for the invisible hand of the market to punch Jim Crow in the nuts.  It didn’t happen.  It will never happen, because this is a fact and it is indisputable: nobody, but NOBODY, responds only to purely economic incentives.  It may be cheaper for you to send your kids to the public school, but if you’re sufficiently bigoted, you’ll pay extra out of your own pocket to send them to the local white-flight academy for an education substantively no better.  Hell, I pay more just to have Doc Martens that are made in Northumberland instead of some Chinese sweatshop, even though the marginal quality is largely indistinguishable and I could save a huge chunk of change by doing otherwise.  Any economist would tell you I’m not rational, and I would reply by saying that I don’t live in economics, I live in reality.

Rand Paul and his fanboys would have you believe that government can’t change people’s minds.  That the right thing to do is sit and wait until people come to their own realization that they should change their beliefs.  But most of all, what it boils down to is this: racism is less of a threat to society than government intervention against racism. It’s the libertarian ethos in its purest form: I got mine, so fuck you.

Is Rand Paul racist?  No.  Is Rand Paul’s articulated belief compatible with the real world? Hell no.  Is this the sort of person who belongs in the Senate?  Not my call.

Your move, Bluegrass State…

 

I just thought of something for the US-England match on June 12, a chant for Sam’s Army that might very well be the absolute most provocative, ugly-American, guaranteed-to-start-a-war-with-Britain thing we could sing from the terraces if we find ourselves nursing a lead with 15 minutes to play…but I don’t dare post it for fear of a jinx.

Still, cock an ear toward Frankfurt on the 12th, and if you hear me howling, you’ll know what it is…

Well, it looks like the official excuse is going to be “you shouldn’t be running so many third-party apps.”

At this point, it’s largely a philosophical dispute about whether users should be allowed to drive their car into a ditch or not.  Google, being a company run by engineers, sees no problem with this.  Apple, being a company run by marketers, insists on protecting you from yourself – even against your will – because people might think the device sucks if the battery comes up short.

You can make an argument either way – I think the iPhone would have been dead on arrival if they had enabled that sort of multitasking, or 3G, or GPS, because terrible battery life would have strangled the baby in the crib – but you can’t really repeal physics.  And the fact is, if you put a bigger load on the processor by multi-tasking, it will consume more power, and the battery will not last as long.  Period, paragraph.  Buy the ticket, take the ride, and no amount of magic pixie-dust will solve that.

 

ETA: try this link, the first one was gobsmacked.

Back to the iPad, borrowed for a couple of days to test the efficacy of blogging right from the website. I think if somebody were willing to carry the physical Bluetooth keyboard, it would be simple to use this for anything I’d do on a laptop or even a net book traveling. Maybe not video Skype, but try doing that on an Atom processor anyway.
I’m not taking eier the pad or the netbook to Europe – not worthwhile given that I’ll be limited to whatever wifi I can find or steal, and best to just stick with the iPhone in permanent airplane mode for that. It sort of worked last time around – I don’t think we set foot in one single cybercafe, unlike the honeymoon where the easyInternet on the Strand across from Charing Cross was our home away from home four days of our first married week. Don’t look at me like that, it was her idea as much as mine…
More and more, too, it looks like there won’t be a change in my phone arrangements. Having work reimburse me for my phone ultimately costs half out of pocket what it would cost to have a work phone and pay the extra rate for personal use. It also doesn’t look like the new iPhone is going to offer the T-Mobile band for 3G, which makes unlocking kind of pointless. So we’re right back where we always were, paying the upgrade on a new iPhone when it comes out and sitting through another two year indenturement to AT and fucking T. Not that I blame Apple – I’ve explained repeatedly how Cingular was the only game in town, being the only dual band carrier, and the fact that we essentially have hardware lock-in even without subsidy locks is just more proof that we are the most backward country on Earth for phones. It still sucks out loud, though…
Ok, the ipad just went to sleep in my lap. Obviously i don’t have that much to say tonight so i will try to hit send…

Gordon Brown is resigning as Prime Minister, which means that the Tories and the Lib Dems must have an agreement in place by which David Cameron can form a government.  So the Sturdy Golden Bear Party (blue + gold SEE WHAT I DID THERE) is ready to ride.

This is a huge, huge, HUGE gamble by Nick Clegg.  The Lib Dems have a far stronger left-libertarian streak than Labour, especially since LibDem and Labor come to the left from two different-ish traditions.  There might be common ground for the LibDems and the Conservatives on some topics, but not on a lot of things that matter – and matter a LOT to LibDem voters.  Nick is going all in with Old Nick, so to speak, because this is the best chance the LibDems will ever have to force electoral reforms that could get them a more permanent place in government with an elected party commensurate with their percentage of the electorate.

But.

If the deal is for a referendum, they are screwed – Labour voters will not want to support a party that sold out to the Thatcherites, and Conservative voters will never support any mechanism that would make the Tories a permanent minority in Parliament (as any real proportional voting system will inevitably force).  What they need to have is a commitment from a Cameron government to implement some sort of reform right up front, whether Instant Runoff (as seems most likely) or something else.

So yeah.  This is a bet – that the future of the LibDem party can be staked on a deal with a Conservative government eager to push in the opposite direction of almost everything the LibDems hold dear.  I stand by my prediction that we’ll have another election by Christmas – and that by then, Clegg and the Liberal Democrats may well wish they’d forced the Tories to govern as a minority government and held their cards until the next round.

Spoilers abound, so beware of the click-through…

Continue reading “Iron Man 2”

Come now the usual whiny contrarian types with their cry of “It’s your own fault!  Anything you put on the Internet is fair game!  You’re stupid if you think you have any privacy on the Internet!”  I’m not linking them because they don’t deserve the press; instead I will simply say: eat a dick.

I don’t “put private information online.”  Simple.  I did put things in a proprietary service that offered explicit granular levels of privacy and control over who could access what, and which was completely off-limits to non-members.  If that service suddenly decides to revoke those privacy controls, without warning, and leave me with no recourse to control my own data on a service that was explicitly non-public previously? That service is run by cocksuckers who should eat shit and die in a fire.

I have tried to get rid of as much of that information as possible, but I have no faith whatsoever that it has not been retained for future marketing purposes by said service.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice – isn’t going to happen.  The truly obnoxious thing is that other services – Tumblr, Twitter, etc – don’t really care how you identify yourself, whereas Facebook made such a big deal of true identity that their changes of policy have now become great whopping privacy violations.

So yes, this is serious.  This is not a bunch of “whiny, entitled dipshits” (TechCrunch has a lot of fucking gall to call anybody else whiny or entitled) – this is a breach of trust, pure and simple.

I’m stuck with Facebook for at least a couple more months because that’s where my reunion is being organized.  But if you’re not already on it, you’d be a fool to join now – and if you’re on it now, you’re an idiot if you don’t have an exit strategy in mind.

I’m going abroad for a couple of weeks, and in that time, posting here will be necessarily limited – if not nonexistent.  I fully intend to keep up with the Tumblr equivalent of this site (don’t forget, the name has changed) but if you know who I really am, you should be able to see the public feeds that will be available (check Facebook for details closer to time).

My question is: would anybody be interested in following via something like Loopt, Latitude, Foursquare, or what have you?  And if so, what do people use for that sort of thing?  I’ll have the iPhone, but with the phone bit turned off, so it’s going to be a glorified iPod Touch – but that’s still going to be my primary internet access and I’ll just have to rely on the availability of Wi-Fi in Western Europe…

Keith Olbermann wrote this in 1997, back when he and Dan Patrick made Sportscenter one of the best shows on television.  Not best sports show, or even best newscast – best shows, period.  And since we are thirteen years on, it may be time to start thinking about who our Ninth Man is…

 

Baseball is often criticized for having an obsession with its own history. Yet, these days, it seems that history alone separates it from every sport. As the character portrayed by James Earl Jones said in the movie “Field Of Dreams,” America has been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt, erased again,
rebuilt again — and all the time baseball has been there.

For better or worse, history, in baseball, is a living thing. And in this spring training, history walks the camps looking for one player to claim as his own.

He is out there somewhere, in Arizona, maybe in Florida. His may be a name we already know; it may be one we do not. He is probably 20 or 21 years old, maybe 22. And he will make his big-league debut some time this year, or spend his first full season in the bigs this year — and he will retire in the year
2016 or 2017. He will be the grand old man of baseball. And they will say, he’s so old that the year he broke in, Eddie Murray was still playing!

He is out there somewhere, in Arizona, maybe in Florida. And to him is about to be passed — the torch. He will some day be the senior player in the game, representing an era at its end. And he will be the ninth man.

Murray, beginning his 21st season, is the eighth man. That’s because he is so old that, when he broke in, Brooks Robinson was still playing. That was in 1977; they were teammates.

And at that time, Robinson, the grand old man of the game, had been playing so long that when he broke in, Bob Feller was still playing. Feller is the sixth man. Because, when Brooks Robinson broke in, Feller had been playing so long that when he was a rookie in 1936, Rogers Hornsby was still playing.

The fifth man. Hornsby had been playing so long that when he was a rookie in 1915, Honus Wagner was still playing; Wagner was the fourth man. He had been playing so long that when he was a rookie in 1897, Cap Anson was still playing. Cap, of course, was the third man. And when Wagner broke in, Cap
Anson had been playing so long that when he was a rookie in 1871, Dickey Pearce was still playing.

The second man. When he was a rookie in 1855, Doc Adams was still playing. And Doc Adams was a member of the Knickerbocker club when on June 19, 1846, it played the first recorded game of baseball as we know it.

He was the first man.

Adams.
Pearce.
Anson.
Wagner.
Hornsby.
Feller.
Robinson.
Murray.
And now, someone new.

He is out there somewhere, in Arizona, maybe in Florida. His may be a name we already know. It may be one we do not. Now, he is only at the beginning. But some day, he will be … the ninth man.

Read the whole thing. http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/05/facebook-rogue/#ixzz0nJN7bcfO